be replayed. It was, three times. Everyone listened in silence.
‘Thank you for bringing this in to us, Mr Reynolds,’ Langton said and ejected the tape. ‘You said you had not made a copy.’
‘No. But it must be obvious that I’d like one.’
‘I have to ask that you do nothing with this. I do not want this call to be made public until I give you permission.’
‘Hang on a second—’
‘Mr Reynolds, this is very serious. I do not want the contents of this call printed in your paper or used for any other reason. We will need to have it sent over to the lab and see what they make of it. It will be vital evidence if the killer is arrested, as we will be able to do a voice match.’
Anna went over to her desk to double-check the contacts made by the original Black Dahlia killer, and then returned to Langton’s office. She passed over her memo, comparing his original call to the one that Reynolds had received. It was almost word for word.
‘I know,’ Langton said, quietly.
‘So what do we do now?’ she asked.
‘Exactly what I said: we get the lab to test and see what they can give us. The journalist in the LA case didn’t tape the call, so at least we are making some fucking progress. Also, if he has her belongings, he will send them to your friend. The original killer did, didn’t he?’
‘Yes, he sent the contents of her handbag.’
Langton drummed his fingers on his desk. ‘Christ Almighty, this is unbelievable, isn’t it?’
She said nothing.
‘I hope to God he doesn’t play silly buggers and go to print on it, especially after talking with Professor Marshe; she was very sure that if we kept no publicity the killer would make contact. She’s been right so far.’
‘Yes, you said,’ Anna felt irritated. ‘I’m sure Mr Reynolds won’t do anything that would harm the investigation.’
‘We have to make bloody sure he doesn’t,’ Langton snapped.
The tape was treated and tested. It did not appear that the caller had been trying to disguise his voice. The lab determined that it was a middle-aged man, well spoken and well educated, with a distinct aristocratic tone, exuding confidence. They felt it would be problematic to try to match it because of the muffled and often indistinct sound. There was no distinctive background noise that would help to pinpoint a probable location but, given time, they could strip the tape down to get more information.
Langton sighed with frustration. He had smoked throughout the briefing. ‘Right, outcome: despite the portrayals by the media and the entertainment industry, there are serious limitations for the experts. They seriously doubt being able to identify taped voices; it’s looking not very positive.’
There was a unanimous moan.
‘I know, I know, but we only have a minute’s worth and they need more. They kept on saying that this type of phonetic analysis is very time-consuming; it requires painstaking preparation of speech samples and close observation of their acoustic and other characteristics. So, in the meantime, we stick our thumbs up our arses because it could take weeks. To match an unknown taped voice with another — should we be so lucky to bloody get one — is not a matter of simply making voiceprints which can be compared in the same way as fingerprints. They reject this in court as evidence, because it can create an erroneous picture in people’s minds: so, in other words, the chaps at the lab are dicking around trying to bring us something, so that if — if! — we do get a friggin’ suspect, we might be able to match it. But this would only give us a lead; nothing more conclusive.’
Disappointed, the team had little to do but continue covering old ground. There was nothing new to work on apart from trying to trace the advert Louise Pennel might have answered. They had so far been unsuccessful, despite contacting virtually every newspaper and magazine, not helped by the fact that they did not know the exact
‘Thank you for bringing this in to us, Mr Reynolds,’ Langton said and ejected the tape. ‘You said you had not made a copy.’
‘No. But it must be obvious that I’d like one.’
‘I have to ask that you do nothing with this. I do not want this call to be made public until I give you permission.’
‘Hang on a second—’
‘Mr Reynolds, this is very serious. I do not want the contents of this call printed in your paper or used for any other reason. We will need to have it sent over to the lab and see what they make of it. It will be vital evidence if the killer is arrested, as we will be able to do a voice match.’
Anna went over to her desk to double-check the contacts made by the original Black Dahlia killer, and then returned to Langton’s office. She passed over her memo, comparing his original call to the one that Reynolds had received. It was almost word for word.
‘I know,’ Langton said, quietly.
‘So what do we do now?’ she asked.
‘Exactly what I said: we get the lab to test and see what they can give us. The journalist in the LA case didn’t tape the call, so at least we are making some fucking progress. Also, if he has her belongings, he will send them to your friend. The original killer did, didn’t he?’
‘Yes, he sent the contents of her handbag.’
Langton drummed his fingers on his desk. ‘Christ Almighty, this is unbelievable, isn’t it?’
She said nothing.
‘I hope to God he doesn’t play silly buggers and go to print on it, especially after talking with Professor Marshe; she was very sure that if we kept no publicity the killer would make contact. She’s been right so far.’
‘Yes, you said,’ Anna felt irritated. ‘I’m sure Mr Reynolds won’t do anything that would harm the investigation.’
‘We have to make bloody sure he doesn’t,’ Langton snapped.
The tape was treated and tested. It did not appear that the caller had been trying to disguise his voice. The lab determined that it was a middle-aged man, well spoken and well educated, with a distinct aristocratic tone, exuding confidence. They felt it would be problematic to try to match it because of the muffled and often indistinct sound. There was no distinctive background noise that would help to pinpoint a probable location but, given time, they could strip the tape down to get more information.
Langton sighed with frustration. He had smoked throughout the briefing. ‘Right, outcome: despite the portrayals by the media and the entertainment industry, there are serious limitations for the experts. They seriously doubt being able to identify taped voices; it’s looking not very positive.’
There was a unanimous moan.
‘I know, I know, but we only have a minute’s worth and they need more. They kept on saying that this type of phonetic analysis is very time-consuming; it requires painstaking preparation of speech samples and close observation of their acoustic and other characteristics. So, in the meantime, we stick our thumbs up our arses because it could take weeks. To match an unknown taped voice with another — should we be so lucky to bloody get one — is not a matter of simply making voiceprints which can be compared in the same way as fingerprints. They reject this in court as evidence, because it can create an erroneous picture in people’s minds: so, in other words, the chaps at the lab are dicking around trying to bring us something, so that if — if! — we do get a friggin’ suspect, we might be able to match it. But this would only give us a lead; nothing more conclusive.’
Disappointed, the team had little to do but continue covering old ground. There was nothing new to work on apart from trying to trace the advert Louise Pennel might have answered. They had so far been unsuccessful, despite contacting virtually every newspaper and magazine, not helped by the fact that they did not know the exact
Similar Books
