Royally Screwed: British Monarchy Revealed by Jacalynne Flax, Debbie Finger, Alexandra Odell
Ads: Link
were to be raised to three times the current level. They took to the streets to protest in force.
If the Prince thought the students would be pleased to see him in his £500,000 car, he was sadly mistaken. The car was pelted with eggs and paint, and his wife was poked with a stick through an open window. And the crowd was heard to yell “off with their heads”.
It could have been worse, the police could have opened fire into the crowd and someone could have died. The Royal couple went home in a blacked out police van, so why couldn’t they have travelled there in the same vehicle??
Ultimately it was the wrong thing to do. This couple lives with spin doctors and poll watchers and yet they couldn’t have gotten it more wrong. They exist and live in another world, on another planet, and are clueless as to what is happening here on Earth. Silly I know, but maybe it’s just me.
Would it be fair to assume that in the eyes of the GBP and possibly the world, this couple commands very little respect and has no relevance or value for their, now more than ever, hard earned tax revenue?? Is it the role of the people to support, spoilt, self indulgence on such a grand scale? Just wondering.
“Charles!!!... Charles!!!”
“Oh, for heaven’s sake, Camilla, do shut up!”.
Now that they are a boring old married couple and no longer an “exciting illicit affair”, Charles has “other” uses for her now un-necessary tampons.
The Royals at Christmas
Where did they get that hat?
Camilla and The Queen in their REAL FUR
Christmas Hats
Queen and Camilla Slammed for Wearing Fur on Christmas
“Orf – with her hat!”
And the Queen was not amused that her daughter-in-law chose to wear exactly the same style of hat – a dead animal on their heads!
Queen Elizabeth and her daughter-in-law, Camilla, have annoyed animal rights activists by wearing fur to attend church on Christmas Day.
Her Majesty wore a Cossack-style fox fur hat and a cream-colored wool coat with fur trim on the cuffs. Camilla, the wife of Prince Charles whose title is the Duchess of Cornwall, wore a similar Russian-style hat by the milliner Phillip Treacy.
Royal Tiaras: Which One Will Kate Middleton Wear to Her Wedding?
Britain’s Daily Mail reported that the hat-maker used “vintage fur” which had previously belonghed to the duchess’s mother. The paper quoted Andrew Tyler, director of the UK charity Animal Aid, saying” This strikes me as an ostentatious display of cruelty. To parade fur in 2010 says something unpleasant about the person wearing it.”
Royal Engagement Rings
Britain’s royals have long been split on the acceptability of wearing fur. The wife of Prince Edward the queen’s youngest son, apologized after being criticized for wearing a fur hat in 2000, calling it “an error of judgment.”
But the Queen herself has enjoyed many traditional pastimes of the aristocracy which seem cruel to modern sensibilities, including shooting weekends and fox hunting (which is now banned in Britain.)
Camilla attracted criticism for wearing fur twice last year during an official visit to Canada. (However, for royal ostentation and fur, it’s hard to go past this picture of Princess Anne standing on a polar bear skin on her wedding day. )
And where does Britain’s lt-Royal, Kate Middleton, stand on fur? While she is not know for draping herself in animal skins, she did controversially wear a mink fur hat to a horse racing event in 2006.
Maybe she’ll tone it down on her wedding day and just pose for pictures standing on a Pillow Pet ?
Don’t forget you can get your royal wedding new at RoyalWedding.aol.com
Morality/Shmorality –
Can we talk Legality??
I can only hope that in the previous 150 pages we have made our case that someone with the moral ethics of a house slug cannot be considered to be the right person to become Queen,
But
If the Prince thought the students would be pleased to see him in his £500,000 car, he was sadly mistaken. The car was pelted with eggs and paint, and his wife was poked with a stick through an open window. And the crowd was heard to yell “off with their heads”.
It could have been worse, the police could have opened fire into the crowd and someone could have died. The Royal couple went home in a blacked out police van, so why couldn’t they have travelled there in the same vehicle??
Ultimately it was the wrong thing to do. This couple lives with spin doctors and poll watchers and yet they couldn’t have gotten it more wrong. They exist and live in another world, on another planet, and are clueless as to what is happening here on Earth. Silly I know, but maybe it’s just me.
Would it be fair to assume that in the eyes of the GBP and possibly the world, this couple commands very little respect and has no relevance or value for their, now more than ever, hard earned tax revenue?? Is it the role of the people to support, spoilt, self indulgence on such a grand scale? Just wondering.
“Charles!!!... Charles!!!”
“Oh, for heaven’s sake, Camilla, do shut up!”.
Now that they are a boring old married couple and no longer an “exciting illicit affair”, Charles has “other” uses for her now un-necessary tampons.
The Royals at Christmas
Where did they get that hat?
Camilla and The Queen in their REAL FUR
Christmas Hats
Queen and Camilla Slammed for Wearing Fur on Christmas
“Orf – with her hat!”
And the Queen was not amused that her daughter-in-law chose to wear exactly the same style of hat – a dead animal on their heads!
Queen Elizabeth and her daughter-in-law, Camilla, have annoyed animal rights activists by wearing fur to attend church on Christmas Day.
Her Majesty wore a Cossack-style fox fur hat and a cream-colored wool coat with fur trim on the cuffs. Camilla, the wife of Prince Charles whose title is the Duchess of Cornwall, wore a similar Russian-style hat by the milliner Phillip Treacy.
Royal Tiaras: Which One Will Kate Middleton Wear to Her Wedding?
Britain’s Daily Mail reported that the hat-maker used “vintage fur” which had previously belonghed to the duchess’s mother. The paper quoted Andrew Tyler, director of the UK charity Animal Aid, saying” This strikes me as an ostentatious display of cruelty. To parade fur in 2010 says something unpleasant about the person wearing it.”
Royal Engagement Rings
Britain’s royals have long been split on the acceptability of wearing fur. The wife of Prince Edward the queen’s youngest son, apologized after being criticized for wearing a fur hat in 2000, calling it “an error of judgment.”
But the Queen herself has enjoyed many traditional pastimes of the aristocracy which seem cruel to modern sensibilities, including shooting weekends and fox hunting (which is now banned in Britain.)
Camilla attracted criticism for wearing fur twice last year during an official visit to Canada. (However, for royal ostentation and fur, it’s hard to go past this picture of Princess Anne standing on a polar bear skin on her wedding day. )
And where does Britain’s lt-Royal, Kate Middleton, stand on fur? While she is not know for draping herself in animal skins, she did controversially wear a mink fur hat to a horse racing event in 2006.
Maybe she’ll tone it down on her wedding day and just pose for pictures standing on a Pillow Pet ?
Don’t forget you can get your royal wedding new at RoyalWedding.aol.com
Morality/Shmorality –
Can we talk Legality??
I can only hope that in the previous 150 pages we have made our case that someone with the moral ethics of a house slug cannot be considered to be the right person to become Queen,
But
Similar Books
