The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, Alex Bell Page B

been able to get hold of it yet. One thing I have discovered though: that account of Richard III is called Sir Thomas More's not because he wrote it but because the manuscript was found among his papers. It was an unfinished copy of an account that appears elsewhere in finished form.'
    'Well!' Grant considered this with interest. 'You mean it was More's own manuscript copy?'
    'Yes. In his own writing. Made when he was 'bout thirty-five. In those days, before printing was general, manuscript copies of books were the usual thing.'
    'Yes. So, if the information came from John Morton, as it did, it is just as likely that the thing was written by Morton.'
    'Yes.'
    'Which would certainly account for the – the lack of sensibility. A climber like Morton wouldn't be at all abashed by back-stairs gossip. Do you know about Morton?'
    'No.'
    'He was a lawyer turned churchman, and the greatest pluralist on record. He chose the Lancastrians side and stayed with it until it was clear that Edward IV was home and dried. Then he made his peace with the York side and Edward made him Bishop of Ely. And vicar of God knows how many parishes besides. But after Richard's accession he backed first the Woodvilles and then Henry Tudor and ended up with a cardinal's hat as Henry VII's Archbishop of –'
    'Wait a minute!' said the boy, amused. 'Of course I know Morton. He was Morton of "Morton's Fork". "You can't be spending much so how about something for the King; you're spending such a lot you must be very rich so how about something for the King?"'
    'Yes. That Morton. Henry's best thumbscrew. And I've just thought of a reason why he might have a personal hatred for Richard long before the murder of the boys.'
    'Yes?'
    'Edward took a large bribe from Louis XI to make a dishonourable peace in France. Richard was very angry about that – it really was a disgraceful affair – and washed his hands of the business. Which included refusing a large cash offer. But Morton was very much in favour both of the deal and the cash. Indeed he took a pension from Louis. A very nice pension it was. Two thousand crowns a year. I don't suppose Richard's outspoken comments went down very well, even with good gold for a chaser.'
    'No. I guess not.'
    'And of course there would be no preferment for Morton under the straight-laced Richard as there had been under the easy-going Edward. So he would have taken the Woodville side, even if there had been no murder.'
    'About that murder –' the boy said; and paused.
    'Yes?'
    'About the murder the murder of those two boys – isn't it odd that no one talks of it?'
    'How do you mean: no one talks of it?'
    'These last three days I've been going through contemporary papers: letters and what not. And no one mentions them at all.'
    'Perhaps they were afraid to. It was a time when it paid to be discreet.'
    'Yes: but I'll tell you something even odder. You know that Henry brought a Bill of Attainder against Richard, after Bosworth. Before Parliament. I mean. Well, he accuses Richard of cruelty and tyranny but doesn't even mention the murder.'
    'What!' said Grant, startled.
    'Yes, you may look startled.'
    'Are you sure?'
    'Quite sure.'
    'But Henry got possession of the Tower immediately on his arrival in London after Bosworth. If the boys were missing it is incredible that he should not publish the fact immediately. It was the trump card in his hand.' He lay in surprised silence for a little, The sparrows on the window-sill quarrelled loudly. 'I can't make sense of it.' he said. 'What possible explanation can there be for his omission to make capital out of the fact that the boys were missing?'
    Brent shifted his long legs to a more comfortable position. 'There is only one explanation,' he said. 'And that is that the boys weren't missing.'
    There was a still longer silence this time, while they stared at each other.
    'Oh, no, it's nonsense,' Grant said. 'There must be some obvious explanation that we are failing to see.'
    'As what, for