is 1982? There is absolutely, positively no chance that every single investigator involved got the date wrong?”
“It was 1982.”
“And you’re sure—absolutely, positively sure—that Richard Umbrio was already incarcerated in Walpole at this time?”
“Yep. Got that date on several reports as well. The Peeping Tom wasn’t Umbrio, D.D. It’s not even a matter of comparing dates. Look at MO. Umbrio was an opportunistic predator, snatch and grab, Hey, little girl, have you seen my lost dog? This is far more elaborate, almost ritualized. We’re talking a totally different breed of whacko.”
“But the use of an underground pit!” D.D. exploded. “The close physical match between Annabelle Granger and Catherine Gagnon. You can’t tell me it’s completely coincidence.”
“There are other options. Copycat, for one. By August ’82, Umbrio’s trial’s long finished, the details of the abduction made public. Maybe someone found it ‘inspirational.’ ”
“But victims’ pictures, particularly children, aren’t made public,” D.D. countered. “So, again, how to explain the physical resemblance between Annabelle and Catherine?”
“Pictures aren’t made public during the trial phase, but Catherine’s description would’ve been broadcast when she was declared missing. And that search went on for four weeks.”
“Huh.” D.D. chewed on her lower lip, considered that information.
Bobby unlaced his fingers. “Umbrio wasn’t a talker. He never volunteered information to the police on what he did, not even after being found. So you have to consider maybe he had other victims. And/or maybe he had help.”
“An accomplice who went unidentified?”
“Yep. Umbrio was barely twenty when he was convicted, nearly a kid himself. Sometimes, two angry juvenile minds…”
“Klebold and Harris.”
“It happens. Finally, I’m wondering about cellmates or pen pals. Pedophiles seem to have a thing for networking. Just consider all the ‘Internet groups’ and international ‘child sex slave’ rings that have been uncovered in recent years. More so than the other homicidal maniacs out there, pedophiles like to chat. Now, Umbrio went to prison with a reputation as a fairly brilliant, if not creative, offender. Maybe someone went looking for him there.”
“Well, this just keeps getting better and better.” D.D. scowled at him. “I thought you had something for my press briefing. What the hell here can I report to the press?”
Bobby held up a staying hand. “One last thing to consider. It’s not scientific, but we can’t dismiss it: cop instinct. You felt it the minute you entered the chamber. I did, too. Catherine Gagnon’s case is somehow tied in to what happened out in Mattapan. I can’t feel it, touch it, or taste it, but I know it’s true, and so do you. Which is why Catherine’s phone call matters so much.”
D.D. suddenly perked up. She appeared almost wild with hope. “Catherine’s returning to Massachusetts? She’s going to talk to us? She’s going to let us finally arrest her for setting up the murder of her husband!”
“Mmm, not quite. Her answer to returning to Mass., as the saying goes, is not anatomically possible. We’re going to her.”
“Oh yeah, two detectives flying to Arizona. Brass will love that.”
“Ahh,” Bobby said with a wiggle of his eyebrows, “but they will. Once you explain to the press that you’ve already had a major break in the case, and will soon be interviewing not one, but two potential witnesses.” Bobby rose out of his chair, headed to the door. Now was the time for a clean getaway. Unfortunately, he wasn’t quite fast enough.
“What do you mean, two witnesses?” D.D. called after him. “Catherine Gagnon is only one.”
“Oh, didn’t I mention that? I meant to include Granger. In return for Catherine’s cooperation, she is demanding to meet Annabelle.”
B OBBY GOT LUCKY at the North End apartment complex; one of the residents
“It was 1982.”
“And you’re sure—absolutely, positively sure—that Richard Umbrio was already incarcerated in Walpole at this time?”
“Yep. Got that date on several reports as well. The Peeping Tom wasn’t Umbrio, D.D. It’s not even a matter of comparing dates. Look at MO. Umbrio was an opportunistic predator, snatch and grab, Hey, little girl, have you seen my lost dog? This is far more elaborate, almost ritualized. We’re talking a totally different breed of whacko.”
“But the use of an underground pit!” D.D. exploded. “The close physical match between Annabelle Granger and Catherine Gagnon. You can’t tell me it’s completely coincidence.”
“There are other options. Copycat, for one. By August ’82, Umbrio’s trial’s long finished, the details of the abduction made public. Maybe someone found it ‘inspirational.’ ”
“But victims’ pictures, particularly children, aren’t made public,” D.D. countered. “So, again, how to explain the physical resemblance between Annabelle and Catherine?”
“Pictures aren’t made public during the trial phase, but Catherine’s description would’ve been broadcast when she was declared missing. And that search went on for four weeks.”
“Huh.” D.D. chewed on her lower lip, considered that information.
Bobby unlaced his fingers. “Umbrio wasn’t a talker. He never volunteered information to the police on what he did, not even after being found. So you have to consider maybe he had other victims. And/or maybe he had help.”
“An accomplice who went unidentified?”
“Yep. Umbrio was barely twenty when he was convicted, nearly a kid himself. Sometimes, two angry juvenile minds…”
“Klebold and Harris.”
“It happens. Finally, I’m wondering about cellmates or pen pals. Pedophiles seem to have a thing for networking. Just consider all the ‘Internet groups’ and international ‘child sex slave’ rings that have been uncovered in recent years. More so than the other homicidal maniacs out there, pedophiles like to chat. Now, Umbrio went to prison with a reputation as a fairly brilliant, if not creative, offender. Maybe someone went looking for him there.”
“Well, this just keeps getting better and better.” D.D. scowled at him. “I thought you had something for my press briefing. What the hell here can I report to the press?”
Bobby held up a staying hand. “One last thing to consider. It’s not scientific, but we can’t dismiss it: cop instinct. You felt it the minute you entered the chamber. I did, too. Catherine Gagnon’s case is somehow tied in to what happened out in Mattapan. I can’t feel it, touch it, or taste it, but I know it’s true, and so do you. Which is why Catherine’s phone call matters so much.”
D.D. suddenly perked up. She appeared almost wild with hope. “Catherine’s returning to Massachusetts? She’s going to talk to us? She’s going to let us finally arrest her for setting up the murder of her husband!”
“Mmm, not quite. Her answer to returning to Mass., as the saying goes, is not anatomically possible. We’re going to her.”
“Oh yeah, two detectives flying to Arizona. Brass will love that.”
“Ahh,” Bobby said with a wiggle of his eyebrows, “but they will. Once you explain to the press that you’ve already had a major break in the case, and will soon be interviewing not one, but two potential witnesses.” Bobby rose out of his chair, headed to the door. Now was the time for a clean getaway. Unfortunately, he wasn’t quite fast enough.
“What do you mean, two witnesses?” D.D. called after him. “Catherine Gagnon is only one.”
“Oh, didn’t I mention that? I meant to include Granger. In return for Catherine’s cooperation, she is demanding to meet Annabelle.”
B OBBY GOT LUCKY at the North End apartment complex; one of the residents
Similar Books
