Ancient Aliens on the Moon by Mike Bara

reds.
    At first, these paintings depicted the lunar surface as we had all been told it was; bland and grey and colorless. But he then began to rethink his work, and as he did so, the images got more and more colorful until eventually they matched not only the colorful images we now see under enhancement, but the far-distant structures as well.
    One of Bean’s paintings, “Rock and Roll on the Ocean of Storms,” not only shows the distinct pink and blue colored lunar surface, it also shows lines in the sky that are eerily reminiscent of the “inclined buttress” structures seen in both the Apollo 14 photography and the Apollo 12 16mm film.
    Now, these angled lines are actually the imprint of a moon boot that Bean puts on all of his paintings of the Moon, but there is no doubt that the placement of it and effect it has recalls the slanted structures seen in the Apollo images.
    But these paintings all raise the question of just how well Bean truly remembers what he saw on the Moon. The fact that he was dissatisfied with the depictions that showed the lunar surface to look like the official NASA version is telling. His need to add color to the Moon’s surface in his paintings (“I had to figure out a way to add color to the Moon without ruining it,” he is quoted as saying) is also telling. Why? Maybe because there was something naggingly wrong with Moon as NASA chooses to depict it. Because of this, I think it is possible that Bean, like many of the other astronauts, has a hard time remembering what he saw and did on the Moon. There have always been rumors that the astronauts were hypnotized during their technical debriefings to “help them remember.” Given Bean’s apparent struggle with getting his artistic depiction of the Moon “right,” I tend to think this is likely.

    “Rock and Roll on the Ocean of Storms” by Alan Bean.
    I also take Bean’s paintings as independent verification that the lunar dome hypothesis is correct, and that the Moon is far more colorful than we’ve been led to believe.
    Which brings us to the first question; could the astronauts have simply missed seeing these towering lunar structures?
    Again, the short answer is no. While the astronauts had filters on their helmets to supposedly help block out ultraviolet rays, these filters would most likely have helped, rather than hindered their ability to “see” the towering glass ruins in the distance. These ultraviolet filters were gold screens (similar to those used on fighter planes today) that could be slid down over the visors. These gold filters had the effect of actually enhancing light in the blue end of the visual spectrum, and we know that these enormous structures (due to a phenomenon called Rayleigh scattering) tend to shift light into exactly that same end of the color spectrum. So if anything, the gold visors would have made it easier to see the distant glass structures, not harder.
    And there is one other piece of evidence that supports the idea that NASA had a pretty good idea about the lunar domes before they ever sent men to the Moon—the landing of Apollo 11.
    By now, we’ve probably all seen the dramatic footage over and over again; the tense mission control engineers, the drama of Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin calling out the dwindling fuel resources, Neil Armstrong having to take over the controls manually to clear a field of boulders, and the scary “1202” alarm that no one could figure out. And then finally the dramatic “The Eagle has landed,” call from Tranquility Base and the relief from “a bunch of guys about to blue” in Mission Control in Houston. But in reality, there is something far more telling about Eagle’s dramatic descent to the lunar surface; what caused the “1202” alarm in the first place?
    We now know, thanks to outlets like NASA TV and the History Channel, that the 1202 alarm was a computer overload alarm. A modern cell phone has thousands of times the computing power that the Lunar