Karlsefneâs, because he would have taken their weapons. And went they now away as usual, and their clothes lay there behind, and their wares; no man had seen this woman, but Gudrid alone.â
This episode, an early instance of the meme of a âWoman-in-black,â took place in the days of Thorfinn Karlsefni, the son of Thord Horsehead, the son of Snorri Thordason of Hofdi. Karlsefni was a companion of Leif Eirikson at Brattahlid. The two authors have disagreed about this case, since it could be considered a ghost story rather than a UFO case, but numerous modern claims of alien visitation fall in the same category and follow the identical model.
Â
Source: Helge Ingstad, Westward to Vinland (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969).
83.
14 April 1054, Rome, Italy
A bright circle in the midday sky
In their paper âDo We Need to Redate the Birth of the Crab Nebula?â astronomers Guidoboni, Marmo, and Polcaro quote from the Tractatus de Ecclesia S. Petri Aldeburgensi , written by a monk or a clerk of the church of St. Peter in the town of Oudenburg, in present-day Belgium, regarding aerial phenomena observed at the time of the death of Pope Leo IX. They argue that the event described was a supernova, which is possible but unlikely.
âThe most blessed Pope Leo, after the beginning of the construction of the aforementioned church of St. Peter, in the following year, on the 18th day before the first of May (i.e., 14 th April 1054), a Monday, around midday, happily departed this world. And at the same time and hour as his leaving of the flesh, not only in Rome, where his body lies, but also all over the world appeared to men a circle in the sky of extraordinary brightness which lasted for about half an hour. Perhaps the Lord wished to say that he [the Pope] was worthy to receive a crown in Heaven between those who love Him.â
The supernova that gave rise to the Crab Nebula was first seen by Chinese astronomers who noted a âguest starâ in the constellation Taurus on July 4, 1054, fully three months after the Rome sighting. Simon Mitton lists 5 independent preserved Far-East records of this event (one of 75 authentic guest stars â novae and supernovae, excluding comets â systematically recorded by Chinese astronomers between 532 BC and 1064 AD). This star became about 4 times brighter than Venus in its brightest light, or about magnitude -6, and was visible in daylight for 23 days. It was probably also recorded by Anasazi Indian artists (in present-day Arizona and New Mexico), as findings in Navaho Canyon and White Mesa as well as in the Chaco Canyon National Park (New Mexico) indicate.
The astronomers note that the English translation of the Latin terms âcirculusâ and âcoronaâ is not perfect, because they do not convey the original sense of âdiscâ that the Flemish writer expressed in his text. âThe fact that corona was conceived as a bright disk (or shield) makes us understand that also circulus in this context must mean the same object. In conclusion, the Flemish chronicler saw a bright disk in the sky, and not a halo. Furthermore, we can observe that in this document, the author describes the phenomenon in neutral terms, unaffected by any set of beliefs: the disk-like shape, the intense brightness and the duration of the phenomenon are all elements common to very different cultures. The author separates the description of the phenomenon from his cautious symbolic interpretation, showing a clear awareness of the different levels of discourse.â Note that the text of the Tractatus does not give the correct date for the Popeâs death, which was 19 April 1054.
Â
Source: E. Guibodoni, C. Marmo and V.F. Polcaro, âDo we Need to Redate the Birth of the Carb Nebula?â Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana 65 (1994): 624.
84.
Circa 1059, Fanliang, China
The bright pearl in the lake
Sheng Gua, a Chinese scholar of the Song Dynasty,
This episode, an early instance of the meme of a âWoman-in-black,â took place in the days of Thorfinn Karlsefni, the son of Thord Horsehead, the son of Snorri Thordason of Hofdi. Karlsefni was a companion of Leif Eirikson at Brattahlid. The two authors have disagreed about this case, since it could be considered a ghost story rather than a UFO case, but numerous modern claims of alien visitation fall in the same category and follow the identical model.
Â
Source: Helge Ingstad, Westward to Vinland (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969).
83.
14 April 1054, Rome, Italy
A bright circle in the midday sky
In their paper âDo We Need to Redate the Birth of the Crab Nebula?â astronomers Guidoboni, Marmo, and Polcaro quote from the Tractatus de Ecclesia S. Petri Aldeburgensi , written by a monk or a clerk of the church of St. Peter in the town of Oudenburg, in present-day Belgium, regarding aerial phenomena observed at the time of the death of Pope Leo IX. They argue that the event described was a supernova, which is possible but unlikely.
âThe most blessed Pope Leo, after the beginning of the construction of the aforementioned church of St. Peter, in the following year, on the 18th day before the first of May (i.e., 14 th April 1054), a Monday, around midday, happily departed this world. And at the same time and hour as his leaving of the flesh, not only in Rome, where his body lies, but also all over the world appeared to men a circle in the sky of extraordinary brightness which lasted for about half an hour. Perhaps the Lord wished to say that he [the Pope] was worthy to receive a crown in Heaven between those who love Him.â
The supernova that gave rise to the Crab Nebula was first seen by Chinese astronomers who noted a âguest starâ in the constellation Taurus on July 4, 1054, fully three months after the Rome sighting. Simon Mitton lists 5 independent preserved Far-East records of this event (one of 75 authentic guest stars â novae and supernovae, excluding comets â systematically recorded by Chinese astronomers between 532 BC and 1064 AD). This star became about 4 times brighter than Venus in its brightest light, or about magnitude -6, and was visible in daylight for 23 days. It was probably also recorded by Anasazi Indian artists (in present-day Arizona and New Mexico), as findings in Navaho Canyon and White Mesa as well as in the Chaco Canyon National Park (New Mexico) indicate.
The astronomers note that the English translation of the Latin terms âcirculusâ and âcoronaâ is not perfect, because they do not convey the original sense of âdiscâ that the Flemish writer expressed in his text. âThe fact that corona was conceived as a bright disk (or shield) makes us understand that also circulus in this context must mean the same object. In conclusion, the Flemish chronicler saw a bright disk in the sky, and not a halo. Furthermore, we can observe that in this document, the author describes the phenomenon in neutral terms, unaffected by any set of beliefs: the disk-like shape, the intense brightness and the duration of the phenomenon are all elements common to very different cultures. The author separates the description of the phenomenon from his cautious symbolic interpretation, showing a clear awareness of the different levels of discourse.â Note that the text of the Tractatus does not give the correct date for the Popeâs death, which was 19 April 1054.
Â
Source: E. Guibodoni, C. Marmo and V.F. Polcaro, âDo we Need to Redate the Birth of the Carb Nebula?â Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana 65 (1994): 624.
84.
Circa 1059, Fanliang, China
The bright pearl in the lake
Sheng Gua, a Chinese scholar of the Song Dynasty,
Similar Books
