its forest. Many things stayed hidden, others spoke to all my senses. It was as if my own gaze took on flesh from contact with the thing seen and then blew on it with warm breath which was almost visible, as when one breathes into frozen air.
At about the same time, I came to understand that I was never more alive than when I was able to give myself, even if only partially, to such an exchange. The capacity to join myself to what I was looking at â and particularly if it was something which had been created â offered me nothing less than immortality â for I left in this thing, destined to outlive me, some scrap of what I had lived.
A river painted by Courbet, containing something of my own experience of water flowing, of wetness, of the visible, was more intensely and permanently alive than I could ever be. And, what is more, it conferred upon me a little of its own immortality. It went beyond me and tugged me into the universal. A prelude by Bach, taking the same path as one of my dreams, but surpassing it in solidity and precision, would then miraculously lend my dream, retrospectively, its own grace.
At this age, too, I came upon my dearest wish: The best thing that might happen, I decided, would be to becomeentirely a painting, a novel, a quartet. Not as a protagonist, whose own life was built into art, but in a more diffused way, to become the under-canvas for a portrait of a gentleman, to become the recurring rhyme of a poem, or to become a description of people dancing at a ball. Thus I would breathe onto such creations and be materialised in them for ever.
At first, I invented a god who lived in the sky, surrounded by a committee of those who were timeless and who looked through a telescope to direct the story of my life! Later, my narcissism pared away by the years, I found enough comfort in the idea that with or without a telescope focused on me, a simple movement of a human face (mine or somebody elseâs) could be the equivalent of a work of art, and that it was the quality of seeing â and, equally, the power of the invitation to look â which offered that feeling of cosmic harmony which I had discovered when a painting welcomed me into its forest.
I started to hunt everywhere for promises of this magic, a magic which is both permanent and ephemeral, inimitable and universal. And so it was that I was led, with the passage of time, to become a film critic, still searching for this sudden solidity and swift incarnation which we call
meaning
.
The Rape of the Sabines
, which I had goggled at long ago by the flaring paraffin lamp and which, for a fraction of a second, surrounded the whole world with its frame, had little by little shown me how art with its miraculous eye â an eye which both fixes and liberates â can seize the essential.
When in 1990 I went to the Titian exhibition in Venice, I saw the old painter coming towards me, and I saw myself spread out in paint on a scrap of canvas. This is what made me want to start a dialogue with John: he who had hinted to me how life welcomes art, he who knew, as well as I do, that everything still escapes us.
Katya Berger Andreadakis
âThatâs purity,â he said,
âIt is the same on the slopes as in your entrails.â
And he spread his hands as would
an old experienced God creating clay
and heavenliness together.
Odysseus Elytis
Letters
PIAZZA SAN MARCO, VENICE
John
,
What do I think about Titian? In one word on a postcard: flesh.
Love, Katya
AMSTERDAM
Kut
,
All right, flesh. First, I see his own, when heâs old. Why do I immediately think of Titian as an old man? Out of solidarity â given my own age? No, I donât think so. Itâs to do with our century and the bitterness of its experience. Itâs always searching for rage and wisdom rather than harmony. Late Rembrandts, late Goyas, Beethovenâs last sonatas andquartets, late Titians ⦠Imagine the élan of a century
Steve Alten
Graham Johnson
Evan Ronan
Linda Mooney
Tessa Radley
Peter Lerangis
E.R. Punshon
R. T. Raichev
David Cole
Jake Logan