theatre audience were looking
for somewhat different fare as British troops
were encircled on the French coast near
Dunkirk.
Dame Agatha practises one of her ‘little
deceptions’ on her readers and audience in
Peril at End House – in which a character
comes back to life after apparently dying –
which was to reappear later. There is no
doubt that she would, from time to time,
repeat parts of her plots. That is hardly
surprising, because I don’t believe any writer
could possibly complete more than seventy
stories without repeating themselves. But
that does not dilute for one moment their
capacity to intrigue, for Poirot is always left
to explain the ‘how dunnit’ of the murder
and, even more important, to reveal the
motive – and how the killer’s mind truly
works.
To me, it is precisely this quality that so
appeals to the public’s imagination when
they see Poirot. Dame Agatha challenges her
readers and viewers to exercise their own
‘little grey cells’ over her mysteries. She
plays entirely fair, leaving clues in plain
sight, if only the audience are clever enough
to spot them, but she never, ever, patronises
them.
As the filming of the second series went on
in that summer of 1989, I came to realise
the honesty and truthfulness in Dame
Agatha’s approach more and more. And as a
result, I became ever more determined that
my Poirot should become a man with an
infinite reservoir of empathy for his fellow
human beings, and who wanted the world to
know it. So I worked harder and harder to
humanise him, and as I did so, I think I
became closer and closer to Poirot himself.
Yet even so, we are not totally alike, I
assure you. My strain of perfectionism
certainly matches Poirot’s. In fact, we
seemed to grow more alike in that respect
the more I played him. But I have to admit
that I had a problem with his egotism and
vanity, qualities which I really don’t share
with him. I may be an actor, but I am most
certainly not, I hope, a vain one.
If anything, I suffer from what Sheila and I
both call ‘repertory actor syndrome’. We both
started in rep in the English provinces and
have never forgotten the experience. Rep for
us meant that we were never exactly sure
where the next job – or the next penny –
was coming from, and it made us very aware
of exactly how precarious an actor’s life can
be. As a result, neither Sheila nor I ever take
anything for granted.
It was that worry which paralysed us when
we didn’t know if there was going to be a
second Poirot series. Could we afford to stay
in our new house in Pinner?
But Peril at End House convinced me that
there might just be a future for the little
Belgian detective and me on television, for
here we were making one of Dame Agatha’s
full-length novels, in a stunning set of
locations, with no expense spared – the
vintage aeroplane at the opening was just
one example of that. As the series got
underway, I suddenly found myself thinking,
‘Perhaps we have a future, after all. Here is
London Weekend making an episode that
lasts longer than an hour, and they are
clearly committed to it.’
In fact, Poirot also worries about money.
In The Lost Mine, which was the third in the
new series, the little man insists, ‘No one
makes Poirot look a fool where money is
concerned’ when he is confronted in his bank
by the fact that he has an overdraft, rather
than the precise sum of forty-four pounds
four shillings and four pence which he always
keeps in his current account. Then, in Double
Sin, Poirot announces that he is ‘finished’ and
‘in retirement’ because no one has consulted
him ‘for weeks’.
I knew exactly how he felt. When the
telephone stops ringing and an actor doesn’t
get any offers, he immediately starts to think
of ‘retirement’. ‘No one wants me, so I will
disappear,’ I would say to myself in the dark
days when there were no parts. ‘I can’t
Alex Albrinck
Elizabeth Singer Hunt
Herman Koch
Frederick H. Christian
Gemma Mawdsley
Roberto Bolaño
Ace Atkins
Arne Dahl
L. M. Hawke
Sadie Romero