of reason, that I find it difficult to distinguish between the two. I am enabled, too, plainly to trace this effect to the mesmeric influence. I cannot better explain my meaning than by the hypothesis that the mesmeric exaltation enables me to perceive a train of ratiocination which, in my abnormal existence, convinces, but which, in full accordance with the mesmeric phenomena, does not extend, except through its
effect
, into my normal condition. In sleep-waking, the reasoning and its conclusion - the cause and its effect - are present together. In my natural state, the cause vanishing, the effect only, and perhaps only partially, remains.
"These considerations have led me to think that some good results might ensue from a series of well-directed questions propounded to me while mesmerized. You have often observed the profound self-cognizance evinced by the sleep-waker - the extensive knowledge he displays upon all points relating to the mesmeric condition itself; and from this self-cognizance may be deduced hints for the proper conduct of a catechism."
I consented of course to make this experiment. A few passes threw Mr. Vankirk into the mesmeric sleep. His breathing became immediately more easy, and he seemed to suffer no physical uneasiness. The following conversation then ensued: - V. in the dialogue representing the patient, and P. myself.
P.
Are you asleep?
V.
Yes - no I would rather sleep more soundly.
P.
[
After a few more passes.
] Do you sleep now?
V.
Yes.
P.
How do you think your present illness will result?
V.
[
After a long hesitation and speaking as if with effort
.] I must die.
P.
Does the idea of death afflict you?
V.
[
Very quickly
.] No - no!
P.
Are you pleased with the prospect?
V.
If I were awake I should like to die, but now it is no matter. The mesmeric condition is so near death as to content me.
P.
I wish you would explain yourself, Mr. Vankirk.
V.
I am willing to do so, but it requires more effort than I feel able to make. You do not question me properly.
P.
What then shall I ask?
V.
You must begin at the beginning.
P.
The beginning! but where is the beginning?
V.
You know that the beginning is GOD. [
This was said in a low, fluctuating tone, and with every sign of the most profound veneration
.]
P.
What then is God?
V.
[
Hesitating for many minutes.
] I cannot tell.
P.
Is not God spirit?
V.
While I was awake I knew what you meant by "spirit," but now it seems only a word - such for instance as truth, beauty - a quality, I mean.
P.
Is not God immaterial?
V.
There is no immateriality - it is a mere word. That which is not matter, is not at all - unless qualities are things.
P.
Is God, then, material?
V.
No. [
This reply startled me very much.
]
P.
What then is he?
V.
[
After a long pause, and mutteringly.
] I see - but it is a thing difficult to tell. [
Another long pause.
] He is not spirit, for he exists. Nor is he matter, as
you understand it
. But there are
gradations
of matter of which man knows nothing; the grosser impelling the finer, the finer pervading the grosser. The atmosphere, for example, impels the electric principle, while the electric principle permeates the atmosphere. These gradations of matter increase in rarity or fineness, until we arrive at a matter
unparticled
- without particles - indivisible -
one
and here the law of impulsion and permeation is modified. The ultimate, or unparticled matter, not only permeates all things but impels all things - and thus
is
all things within itself. This matter is God. What men attempt to embody in the word "thought," is this matter in motion.
P.
The metaphysicians maintain that all action is reducible to motion and thinking, and that the latter is the origin of the former.
V.
Yes; and I now see the confusion of idea. Motion is the action of
mind
- not of
thinking
. The unparticled matter, or God, in quiescence, is (as nearly as we can conceive it) what men call mind. And the power of self-movement (equivalent in
effect
, into my normal condition. In sleep-waking, the reasoning and its conclusion - the cause and its effect - are present together. In my natural state, the cause vanishing, the effect only, and perhaps only partially, remains.
"These considerations have led me to think that some good results might ensue from a series of well-directed questions propounded to me while mesmerized. You have often observed the profound self-cognizance evinced by the sleep-waker - the extensive knowledge he displays upon all points relating to the mesmeric condition itself; and from this self-cognizance may be deduced hints for the proper conduct of a catechism."
I consented of course to make this experiment. A few passes threw Mr. Vankirk into the mesmeric sleep. His breathing became immediately more easy, and he seemed to suffer no physical uneasiness. The following conversation then ensued: - V. in the dialogue representing the patient, and P. myself.
P.
Are you asleep?
V.
Yes - no I would rather sleep more soundly.
P.
[
After a few more passes.
] Do you sleep now?
V.
Yes.
P.
How do you think your present illness will result?
V.
[
After a long hesitation and speaking as if with effort
.] I must die.
P.
Does the idea of death afflict you?
V.
[
Very quickly
.] No - no!
P.
Are you pleased with the prospect?
V.
If I were awake I should like to die, but now it is no matter. The mesmeric condition is so near death as to content me.
P.
I wish you would explain yourself, Mr. Vankirk.
V.
I am willing to do so, but it requires more effort than I feel able to make. You do not question me properly.
P.
What then shall I ask?
V.
You must begin at the beginning.
P.
The beginning! but where is the beginning?
V.
You know that the beginning is GOD. [
This was said in a low, fluctuating tone, and with every sign of the most profound veneration
.]
P.
What then is God?
V.
[
Hesitating for many minutes.
] I cannot tell.
P.
Is not God spirit?
V.
While I was awake I knew what you meant by "spirit," but now it seems only a word - such for instance as truth, beauty - a quality, I mean.
P.
Is not God immaterial?
V.
There is no immateriality - it is a mere word. That which is not matter, is not at all - unless qualities are things.
P.
Is God, then, material?
V.
No. [
This reply startled me very much.
]
P.
What then is he?
V.
[
After a long pause, and mutteringly.
] I see - but it is a thing difficult to tell. [
Another long pause.
] He is not spirit, for he exists. Nor is he matter, as
you understand it
. But there are
gradations
of matter of which man knows nothing; the grosser impelling the finer, the finer pervading the grosser. The atmosphere, for example, impels the electric principle, while the electric principle permeates the atmosphere. These gradations of matter increase in rarity or fineness, until we arrive at a matter
unparticled
- without particles - indivisible -
one
and here the law of impulsion and permeation is modified. The ultimate, or unparticled matter, not only permeates all things but impels all things - and thus
is
all things within itself. This matter is God. What men attempt to embody in the word "thought," is this matter in motion.
P.
The metaphysicians maintain that all action is reducible to motion and thinking, and that the latter is the origin of the former.
V.
Yes; and I now see the confusion of idea. Motion is the action of
mind
- not of
thinking
. The unparticled matter, or God, in quiescence, is (as nearly as we can conceive it) what men call mind. And the power of self-movement (equivalent in
Similar Books
